Prison Categorisation Challenge

At Prisoner Rights Legal Services, we understand how prison categorisation affects daily life, rehabilitation, and family contact. Being placed in the wrong category can lead to unnecessary restrictions and missed opportunities. If a prisoner believes their category is too high, it is possible to request a review, submit evidence, and appeal. With the right preparation and guidance, many succeed in moving to a lower category. Our team submite well-supported applications and appeals. Contact us today for expert support with categorisation reviews.

Need immediate advice? Call us today on 0203 697 0403 for a confidential discussion.

What Prison Categorisation Means

Prison categorisation is the system used to decide how much security a prisoner requires. In England and Wales, prisons are divided into four categories:

  • Category A – High security. Prisoners whose escape would be highly dangerous to the public, police, or national security.
  • Category B – Secure conditions for prisoners who do not require Category A but still pose an escape risk if given lower security.
  • Category C – Prisoners who cannot be trusted in open conditions but are considered unlikely to make a determined escape attempt.
  • Category DOpen conditions for prisoners considered low risk and nearing release, trusted not to escape.

Higher categories (A–C) involve stricter rules, barriers, and restrictions, while Category D offers more independence and preparation for life after prison. Categorisation is reviewed throughout a sentence to ensure it reflects the prisoner’s risk level, behaviour, and progress.

Reasons to Challenge a Category Decision

Not every categorisation decision is accurate or fair. A prisoner may wish to challenge if they believe their category is too high for the risks they actually pose.

Some of the most common reasons include:

  • Good behaviour in custody – consistent rule-following and no disciplinary issues.
  • Progress in rehabilitation – completing courses, therapy, or vocational training.
  • Approaching release – showing readiness for resettlement and lower security.
  • Errors or outdated reports – sometimes incorrect or old information influences categorisation decisions.

Challenging a category decision allows a prisoner to present evidence of their progress and argue that lower security conditions would support their rehabilitation and reduce reoffending risk.

The Review Process Explained

Prison category review is when a prisoner’s security level is checked again to ensure it is still appropriate. Reviews can happen automatically at set intervals or be requested by the prisoner.

 

The process usually involves:

1. Collecting Information: reports are gathered from prison staff, offender supervisors, psychologists, and others. 

2. Assessing Risk: behaviour, progress, and any ongoing risks to the public are carefully considered.

3. Review Decision: a review board or prison manager makes a decision based on the evidence.

4. Outcome given: if suitable, the prisoner may be moved to a lower category. If not, reasons are provided.

Reviews aim to balance public safety with fairness, ensuring prisoners are held in the right type of prison for their current situation.

Common Grounds for Success

Not every review leads to a change, but success is more likely where there is clear evidence of progress and reduced risk. Common grounds for success include:

  • Sustained good behaviour – no recent disciplinary actions and positive staff reports.
  • Completion of rehabilitation courses – anger management, drug or alcohol programmes, or education achievements.
  • Work or training – involvement in prison jobs, vocational training, or further study.
  • Preparing for release – evidence of strong family support, confirmed housing, or work opportunities after release.
  • Demonstrating responsibility – following rules, helping others, or showing maturity.

These factors demonstrate that the prisoner is ready for less security and can be trusted with greater responsibility.

What Happens if a Review is Refused

If a categorisation review is refused, the prisoner will remain in their current category. This can feel discouraging, but it is not the end of the process.

When a refusal happens:

  • Reasons are given – the refusal letter explains why the category was not lowered.
  • Feedback provided – this highlights what needs to change before another review.
  • Future applications – prisoners are usually told when they can reapply, often at the next review date.
  • Appeal options – if the decision seems unfair, based on mistakes, or missing key evidence, the prisoner can appeal for it to be looked at again.

The key is to treat refusals as an opportunity to address concerns and strengthen the case for the future.

How we can help

At Prisoner Rights Legal Services, we specialise in helping prisoners challenge and review categorisation decisions. Our services include:

01

Preparing Applications: making sure reviews are supported with clear arguments and strong evidence.

02

Drafting Appeals: creating professional written representations that address the refusal directly.

03

Gathering Evidence: helping to collect behaviour reports, course completion certificates, family support letters, and other supporting documents.

04

Following Up: sending reminders and chase letters to ensure the application or appeal is not overlooked.

05

Providing Ongoing Support: guiding prisoners and families through each step of the process.

Our goal is to make sure categorisation decisions are fair, accurate, and reflect a prisoner’s true progress and risk level.

Prison Categorisation Challenge FAQs

Prison categorisation decides the security level a prisoner is held under. Categories range from A (high security) to D (open prisons), based on risk, behaviour, and progress.

Yes. If a prisoner believes their category is too high, they can request a review, submit evidence, and appeal to argue for placement in a lower category.

Reviews happen automatically at set intervals, but prisoners can also request a review earlier if they believe their category no longer reflects their risk level.

If refused, the prisoner remains in their current category. Reasons are given, feedback highlights improvements needed, and reapplication is usually allowed at the next review date.

We prepare clear applications, gather evidence, draft appeals, and provide ongoing support to help prisoners and families present a strong case for fair categorisation.

Next Steps

If you or a loved one believes a prison category is too high, we can help. A wrongly assigned category can have a major impact on sentence progression, access to rehabilitation, and preparation for release.

Prisoner Rights Legal Services offers a free initial conversation to discuss your situation and explain how we can support your application or appeal.

Complete our online form

Don’t let an unfair categorisation hold back progress. With the right advice and support, you can take steps towards a fairer categorisation, better opportunities, and eventual release.

Silhouette-1.webp

Speak to a Prison Law Expert Today

or complete our enquiry form and we’ll come back to you

Latest New and Insights